fiscal policy is usually one where the spending and tax levels in an economy
are determined without taking into account intertemporal budget considerations (Davig and Leeper, 2011). On the
other hand, active monetary policy involves pursuing inflation target without
using fiscal policies. There are various arguments provided in support and
against active monetary and fiscal policy. One of the arguments in support of
active fiscal and monetary policy is that economy usually fluctuates when it is
left on its own. In a scenario where households and firms become pessimistic
about an economy, they tend to reduce spending leading to a decline in
aggregate demand. The decline in AD leads to a reduction in production of
services and goods in an economy. Consequently, the levels of outputs end up
declining, and unemployment increases making an economy to end up entering into
a recession. Therefore, for purposes of
stabilizing AD in an economy a government has to make use of active monetary
and fiscal policy.
second argument in support of active stabilization policies is related to the
fact that unexpected contractions and expansions in an economy leads to
imposition of costs on firms and people, which comes in the form of inflation,
uncertainty and unemployment. Thus, in this kind of a situation the active
economic stabilization policies can be used for purposes of helping to deal
with unexpected economic expansions as well as contractions. This is the case
due to the fact that leaving the economy alone as a policy maker, result in it
taking a lot of time before it can make adjustments on it won. Due to economic
problems created by expansion and contractions of an economy waiting for the
long-term self-adjustment is too long, calling for the government to make use
of active monetary as well as fiscal policy (Davig and Leeper, 2011).
One of the arguments provided against
use active monetary and fiscal policy is that they impact an economy by
creating a long-term lag. The economic conditions of a nation keeps on changing
from time to time, hence, the policy impacts that result from a lag, can end up
hitting an economy at inappropriate time, resulting to creation of an unstable
economy in the long run. The second argument is that policymakers are supposed
to stop interfering with the economy as it ends up making appropriate
adjustments in the long run.
am in support of the use of active monetary and fiscal policy in an economy.
First, when the aggregate demand in an economy keeps on declining it is the
role of the government to employ the monetary and fiscal policy immediately
with an objective of reducing high levels of unemployment that comes with the
decline. For purposes of reducing the suffering of people in an economy it is
appropriate to make use of active stabilization policies as basis of increasing
AD in the short-run. Also, for purposes of dealing with short-term inflations,
arising from unexpected expansions and contractions, it is essential to make
use of active stabilization policies to ensure that levels of inflation, which
makes the cost of living high, are dealt with in the short run (Kuncoro, 2015).
balanced budget is one where the government expenditures are equal to the
revenue available (Greiner, 2008). A number of arguments have been provided
against and for a balance budget in an economy. One of the arguments for a
balanced budget is that in the future debt spiral off might end up occurring
creating financial crisis in the economy. The proponents of this argument indicate
that in the future, there will be a time when investors in government bonds
will end up having no faith of getting their money back resulting in high
interest rates in the form of compensation associated with the expected high
risk, and this will end up creating budget deficits, making the government to
be in more debts in order to meet its day to day operational expenses and
investment needs. According to Greiner (2008) indicates that many people oppose
the idea of high debts due to the fact that they will be unattainable in the
future. For example, when a government has a deficit it is forced to borrow
more in order to meet the expenditure needs, and continues borrowing might end
up leading to a situation the debt available is not sustainable at all. This
means that the government will not be in a position to meet its debt
obligations to the investors.
one of the arguments provided against balanced budget is the fact that it is
difficult for the government to achieve economic growth without having to
borrow in order to invest in capital investment projects, which enable an
economy to achieve an increment in AD demand, leading to high level of
employment (Greiner, 2008). In addition, there are those who argue that it is
difficult to have a balanced budget, given that the government will have more
needs than the available finances and it is difficult to do away with certain
expenditures, such as social welfare funds, and national defense spending,
which creates budget deficit in most cases. Therefore, a government will be
forced in most cases to borrow a lot of funds with an objective of meeting expenditure
needs which are essential to making the life of its citizens better.
do not support the idea of balanced budget as it is not a good one of the
long-term development of a country. First, I believe that government needs to
borrow with an objective of increasing employment levels. The government has to
spend more resources in capital projects, such as roads, and other major
infrastructures with an objective of stirring long-term economic growth, which
is essential in increasing AD, which contributes in making an economy attain
high growth. In order to invest in most capital projects a government has to
borrow as the existing revenues are usually not adequate. In addition, the
government has to support social welfare programs and cannot do away with them
as they are essential in ensuring that the quality of life for the low income
households and individuals is improved in the long run. Thus, essentially, the
government needs to borrow at times to continue supporting development and
recurrent expenditure for the long-term well-being of its citizens.
Calculate The Price Of Your Order
Total Price After Discount:
Frequently Asked Questions
All our writers are PHD prepared individuals. All the writers have vast experiences in specified fields for example for nursing orders the writers must have (nursing experience and major exposure to healthcare)
We get our articles from PubMed (for medicine orders and nursing) and whatever we can access through Google and scholarly references. We use professional sites and any relatable recent references within ten years.
We have a strict 0% plagiarism policy. All our papers are written from scratch and are properly cited.
Furthermore, we use premium plagiarism checkers to scan all documents before delivery.
The paper you will receive will be 100% original.
Email everything to us at firstname.lastname@example.org. You will receive a confirmation email from the support staff.
First, proceed to place your order then you can attach and send everything else the writer will need via email.
Yes, any alterations will be free of charge as long as they are in line with the initial instructions provided. No "surprises" regarding the price.
Any feedback from her professor will be taken seriously, and the writer (under our terms) will work on all changes without any extra payments (we do not have any hidden charges).
We will conduct a free plagiarism check, chapter by chapter. Editing is free of charge since the writer works hand in hand with an assigned editor.
The account will automatically be created for you by our database. The account only notes your order details and the price for your order, nothing much.