Utilitarianism | MyPaperHub

Utilitarianism

Utilitarianism is one of the many ethical theories and according to which an action is right or wrong depending on the maximization of the overall well-being. In other terms, an action is termed as being ethical if the number of people benefiting from it is higher than those that do not get positive benefits. The theory requires people to make decisions and actions that maximize the well-being of the highest number of people possible. The welfare, in this case, is closely associated with happiness (Eggleston, B. 452).

Utilitarianism is universal where every community has its own set of rules and if followed maximizes happiness. In most cases, it applies in the modern democracy where governments use the theory to determine what is right for the people (Eggleston, B. 453). The approach has flaws however that cannot be assumed. One of the weaknesses is that it does not adhere to individual rights like the right to life, to liberty, and to fair treatment. When one has a right to something, it means that they deserve to be given even though people do not agree with the person. However, the theory disregards an individual and instead supports what the majority want in spite of it being a violation of the single individual’s right.

The other flaw in the theory is that it is consequential and does not look at the past actions of an individual. As a result, an individual who follows this theory does not look at the past to weigh but instead focuses on the future and in a way blurs the intention of the act. Finally, the utilitarian theory is excessively demanding. For example, if an individual has a resource needed by another person, the person with the resource is obliged to give it to the person in need if the person would benefit more the person giving would lose (Eggleston, B. 456).

The implication of this is that although the theory is applicable in some cases, it should not be the only theory to be used as when looking at an act, it is always good to consider the other side of the situation. For example, when considering an individual’s contribution to the greatest good, his/her happiness should be put into consideration.


Work Cited


Eggleston, B. "Utilitarianism." Encyclopedia Of Applied Ethics, 2012, pp. 452-458. Elsevier,

doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-373932-2.00220-9.

Additional articles

What defines a country as the greatest giving statistics and opinions

In the present world, many countries (nations) are considered to be great but only very few are considered to be the greatest. Many research and opinions have been given out to what the greatest nation or country constitute, many saying availabil...What-defines-a-country-as-the-greatest-giving-statistics-and-opinions …

Read Article
Current Education System is Failing The Entire Student Population

This article does go against the very epicenter “social conditioning” on education as a whole but it’s not actually misleading anyone just airing out issues which need to be fixed in order to maintain a great balance as far as our education sys...Current-Education-System-is-Failing-The-Entire-Student-Population …

Read Article
How Does Money Change Everything?

The money came to replace the previous system of bartering of one good for another. The bartering system was inefficient and tiring since one had to have the service or product that the other needed to carry out an exchange. However, with the intr...How-Does-Money-Change-Everything? …

Read Article
Let's give your paper the attention it deserves