Rolston’s Argument | MyPaperHub

Holmes Rolston presents many dilemmas in his argument that discuss on poverty, inequality, overpopulation, human rights, and even nature. Under poverty, Holmes argues that people worldwide engage in luxurious activities even with people starving somewhere due to lack of food. He, however, says that these people believe that they are justified to do so instead of eradicating poverty. Therefore, he believes that we are not morally mandated to eliminate poverty. In overpopulation, Holmes does not believe that people are morally required to prevent the death and suffering of other human beings. In his argument, he says that people choose policies that will see the death of a certain percentage of the population. According to him, we face three major problems which include over-consumption, overpopulation and poor distribution of wealth (Aiken & LaFollette, 1996).

Under human right, Rolston believes that they are not absolute and that some are weak while others are strong. In other words, human rights can sometimes be overridden by different values. The last and primary argument is between nature and starvation of human beings. Rolston argues that in cases where the need to feed starving people conflicts with protecting the environment, the later should be prioritized. Holmes argues on eliminating of human settlement and their activity in areas that have been classified as valuable but fragile. He argues that sometimes it is right to let people starve to save the nature. He presents human beings as cancer that may cause a distraction in the environment (Attfield, 1998).

I agree with Holmes only on the issue of not being able to feed the starving humanity because if we were to focus on poverty elimination, the civilization we are experiencing today could not have been realized. There is enormous potential in the world’s population, and if all this were to focus on poverty eradication, a lot would be lost. However, I do not agree on the issue of choosing nature over human beings. Environmental problems existed even before an increase in human activity. Human activity did not cause the extinction of animals like the dinosaurs. They were faced out because they were not able to evolve. Human beings are also part of the animals and have been able to evolve hence existing for a long time. Therefore, the need to preserve those things that can be able to adapt to change and leave those that cannot.

Additional articles

The Drug Abuse Resistance Education Program

The Drug Abuse Resistance Education Program A large number of people today find themselves in the trap of drugs and substance abuse in their adult life. The habit is as a result of exposure to these drugs at a very young age and did not have p...The-Drug-Abuse-Resistance-Education-Program …

Read Article
Article Summary

Scott in the article ‘Essential Oils and Aromatherapy: Worth the Hype?” tries to analyze the evidence available concerning the use of aromatherapy as a form of alternative and complementary medicine. The article first introduces the concept of...Article-Summary …

Read Article
Case Study about Mobile Technology

From the case study, PepsiCo and the fellow beverage competitor have both adopted the use of mobile security application offered by Apple. AirWatch mobile device is used in the management of on an individual employee, group, or the corporate leve...Case-Study-about-Mobile-Technology …

Read Article
Let's give your paper the attention it deserves