Anthropocentrism: Environmental Ethic | MyPaperHub

Do you think anthropocentrism is an acceptable basis for an environmental ethic? Justify your view

ANTHROPOCENTRISM

Anthropocentrism assumes that human beings are the only bearers of intrinsic value and that all the other living things on earth exist to sustain the existence of humanity. Humanity with this in mind have destroyed the nature’s balance hence causing environmental degradation which might lead to the extinction of humanity itself if not controlled. Although the human race is the only thing perceived to think, the other living organisms have the same chance of existence without interference by human beings or destruction (Dalile, 2012). It is for this reason that this paper does not support Anthropocentrism as an acceptable basis for environmental ethics. Instead, the essay will provide support showing why anthropocentrism should not be used in environmental ethics.

The Anthropocentric ethics claims that although human beings have responsibilities towards the natural world, the responsibility is not direct (Burchett, 2016). The claim in my view is incorrect as anything human being does in the natural world directly affects the ecosystem. For example, the release of excessive greenhouse gases by humans through their every day to day activities has continued to destroy the ozone layer. However, if they plant more trees to act as carbon sinks, the depletion of the ozone layer would be slowed. The same can be seen when trees are cut down, they directly affect an ecosystem causing effects like soil erosion and desertification, however, if human beings do not cut down the trees the ecosystem would be maintained. The relationship between human beings and the environment is direct therefore any claims that humans are not directly responsible for the environment are false.

The ethical approach also justifies humanity’s exploration of nature which in many cases causes degradation of nonhuman components of nature (Dalile, 2012). Every element in the ecosystem plays an essential role in maintaining the balance; if one component dominates the environment, there is bound to be an imbalance causing the other components to suffer. The ethical approach gives more power to the humanity which as we see is causing environmental degradation that affects all the elements of the environment including the humankind responsible.

Additional articles

History of ISIS and the Conflict in the Region

The ISIS received the room to take control, as well as blossom id the Iranian-supported order of the Levant, entailing Hezbollah in Lebanon, Haidar al Abadi in Iraq, along with as-Assad in Syria. The sustenance of all these is from the Shiite Isla...History-of-ISIS-and-the-Conflict-in-the-Region …

Read Article
Argument Essay: Legalizing Medical Marijuana

The attitude of humans especially American citizens towards marijuana (also known as weed or pot) have significantly varied from the time its use was illegalized in the 1930s to the present day. In 1970, the US Congress considered marijuana has "n...Argument-Essay:-Legalizing-Medical-Marijuana …

Read Article
The Boko Haram - Agenda, Mission and Historical Foundations

The Boko Haram Terrorism is a global issue that has been in existence for some centuries now. It can be traced to as far as the 1880s when the first acts of a group of terrorists from Russia were felt. The group of Russians who terrorized pe...The-Boko-Haram---Agenda,-Mission-and-Historical-Foundations …

Read Article
Let's give your paper the attention it deserves