Comparative politics can be defined as
the study of domestic politics in various countries. Comparative politics dates
back long before the modern systematic political studies. It dates back to the
ancient Rome and Greece. Comparative politics during the time summed up to
people from one principality comparing and contrasting their political
situation with those of a different territory with whom they came into contact
with. In the modern world, comparative politics includes analysis of the
political systems in the world in a comparative manner. There is very little
agreement on how to study politics in a comparative way which is as a result of
the complexity of the task in that there are so many political systems to
compare in the world (Lim, Timothy).
Some scholars and researchers compare
political systems of different countries to judge which types the best
particular values. The values, in this case, are order, economic security,
well-being, equality and freedom of the citizens. The primary purpose of the
comparative politics could be understood as providing an understanding of why
and how different countries develop the different kinds of political
institutions. The other goal of using comparative politics is to find out the
theories and general laws that explain human political behavior. Comparative
politics utilizes two approaches. The first method is by comparing particular
problems in different countries and the second is an in-depth examination of the
primary political processes in a state or a group of nations located in one
region, for example, countries in South America as a region (Lim,
Timothy).
The definition of the field of
comparative politics is based upon the meaning of the two words; Politics and
comparative. Politics are all the activities associated with the governance of
a country within their national boundaries. Comparative, on the other hand, is
derived from the word compare which is defined as the process of assessing any
contrasts and resemblance between two or more things. In this case, therefore,
it is the comparison of political systems of different countries.
Additional articles
Holmes Rolston presents many dilemmas in his argument that discuss on poverty, inequality, overpopulation, human rights, and even nature. Under poverty, Holmes argues that people worldwide engage in luxurious activities even with people starving s...Rolston’s-Argument …
Read ArticleLearning is fluidly moving across multimodal spaces as presented in the playgrounds of the 21st Century. The experiences of the children in the contemporary society extend across both play virtual worlds and the schoolyard playgrounds. It is media...In-Depth-Analysis-of-Webkinz-Animals …
Read ArticleBartky begins with presenting Foucault’s argument on docile bodies. The author shows docility in the example of the soldier in the 17th century where he is easily recognizable in the body and action. The docile body is therefore used, transforme...Analysis-of-Sandra-Bartky’s-Foucault,-Femininity,-and-the-Modernization-of-Patriarchal-Power. …
Read Article