Police departments have gone through
scrutiny in ...
Police departments have gone through
scrutiny in recent years concerning the laws around the use of videos recorded
during incidences they encounter on their duty. Recently I North Carolina a
shooting occurred when parts of the incident were recorded by the cameras and
other parts could not be seen as the camera could not capture from all angles
on what was happening. A civilian who the police claimed to be in possession of
a gun was shot as he was resisting arrest. The police did not release the
footage of the incident, and therefore the public protested against the
restrictions of the police department (Blau and
The protesters continued with the
demands even after five days after the death of the individual who was shot.
The police department finally gave in to the wishes of the public and released
the footage shortly after footage from the cellphone of the deceased wife was
aired. The citizens were acting by their right, but after the signing of the
new law concerning release of future footages, the public will not have a
chance to demonstrate as they were stripped of the opportunity by the new law.
The governor during the signing said that the law was meant to balance the
safety and rights of the officers and the trust of the public. The new law
dictates that the video footages are not public and therefore the police
department reserves the right to share the footage or not (Blau and Grinberg). This paper will try to look at the
use of the in-car cameras by the police officers from a historical perspective.
Technology has been seen taking over the
entire country with every activity having a technological touch in it over the
past two decades. Security agencies have not been left behind in embracing the
new technologies as they make their work easier and transparent. The
technological advancement that has been seen in the security department
includes easy access to National Crime Information Center, the state, and even
local data through Mobile Data Terminals (MDTs). The officers can take reports,
map crimes and even retrieve information efficiently through the use of Report
Management Systems (RMS). The police officers on the ground are also able to
license and warrant information within a very short time (Grady Baker et al. 4). The mentioned above are just a
few or the advances that technology has brought in the security agencies within
our country and all around the world. Effectiveness and efficiency are achieved
through the technology. Other than that, some of the technology instills
confidence in the citizens of the nation on the efficacy of the agencies. One
of these tools policing and management is the camera in police cars. The
cameras are often referred to as the in-car cameras.
The in-car cameras are the most widely
used form of technology due to a wide range of reasons. The late 1990s saw many
lawsuits filed against the police agencies like local police departments,
Homeland securities and more. Most of the lawsuits were based on allegations of
racial discriminations. There were accusations of race-based traffic stops by
the highway patrol agencies in the entire United States. In most instances, the
court ruled against the departments accepting that the racial profiling
accusations. The court’s decision gave more strength to the public’s notion
that police agencies are profiling on racial ground. The idea resulted in a lot
of people losing faith and confidence in the work the police officers and
related agencies do. Installing in-car cameras in the police force vehicles was
the only solution for the department as very thing taking place in the field
would be recorded by the cameras. The use of cameras was a proactive move that
would help the agency executives stop biased policing and focus on restoring
the public confidence (Westphal). The in-car
cameras would provide honest accounts of the happenings that would be in
question allowing the public to judge from what is recorded and not from a
History of in-car
The first video system in America became
available in early years of the 1960s. The videotape recording system was
however too bulk. The Connecticut State Police Department during the 60s
conducted the experiment to determine whether a video tape recorder could be
used to record events in the field in a patrol car. The camera was on a tripod
that occupied the whole passenger side next to the driver. The recorder and
cables, on the other hand, took up the back seat and filled it. The experiment
was fruitful as they were able to conclude that video recorders would be
helpful in playing a crucial role in the patrol. However, due to the bulkiness
of the equipment, it would be impractical to carry the videotape recorders
everywhere (Grady Baker et al. 5).
A decade after the first experiment
there were advancements in the field of audio and visual recordings. However,
it is until the early 80s when the self-contained Beta visual and audio
recorder was introduced. The recording system was an advancement that
revolutionized the recording industry. The Beta audio/visual recording system
was followed by the VHS tape and recorder which was also followed by an
introduction of 8mm camcorders. The further the technology the minimal space
the equipment would take and the more affordable it would be. The process
became easy to record and the more it was used for the purpose of mainstream
policing. The closed circuit devices were installed in lockup facilities where
they would be applied in monitoring them. Security agencies began using the
devices to record crime scenes which allowed for a more comprehensive
investigation of a crime committed. The system was unlike the use of
photographs that were in use at the time. The devices were portable unlike the
early 1960s machine; they this equipment in officer’s operations for interrogations,
surveillance, and training (Grady Baker et al. 5).
Mothers Against Drunk Drivers (MADD) was
formed in 1980 which brought awareness to the public on the problems associated
with drunk driving. A strong emphasis was put on convicting and punishing by the
prosecutors during court arraignments. The police agencies installed cameras in
vehicles which would record the whole session from the initial events leading
to the police officer pull off the driver to the point of sobriety testing. The
installation of the cameras proved to be a useful tool in providing
undisputable evidence when one got convicted of drunk driving. The MADD saw the
potential in utilizing the in-car cameras hence began buying the systems for
police agencies. The equipment would be used to detect and apprehend drivers
under the influence of alcohol and in violation of the laws that prohibit
driving under the influence of alcohol (Grady Baker et
For the years that followed from 1980,
the fight against drugs in America heightened by the help of in-car cameras.
The cameras would record each and every event which would be used as evidence
against the offenders in the court. Hundreds of cases were closed with the help
of these cameras which recorded evidence obtained when may be an offender was
pulled over by the officers (Grady Baker et al. 5).
By 1999, those local police department
that did not have the in-car cameras for their patrols started having to deal
with issues related to racial policing. The people who were pulled over by the
police officers would complain that it there was racial discrimination. The
police state departments found themselves in the middle of controversies for
racial profiling and at the same time there were increased attacks and assaults
on the police officers in the field. The federal legislative bodies enacted
laws that would require the cops to document details of each and every traffic
stop due to concerns over the escalation of the negative events. The
organizations responsible for the security of the country recognized the
essence and the contribution of the in-car cameras. The purchase of this
equipment was however very expensive and needed high capital investment which
would be a burden for every police department to invest in. The COPS office,
however, started an initiative by the name In-Car Camera Initiative Program for
the highway patrol and the state police agencies throughout the entire United
States. The first funds were delivered in the year 2000 (Grady
Baker et al. 5).
A study conducted by the National
Institute of Justice reported that only 11% of the highway and state police
patrol vehicle were equipped with the in-car camera technology. However, over
the three years that followed the COPS office gave over $21 million the
security agencies to purchase the in-car cameras and install them. The number
grew very first reaching up to 72% a shift of 61% (Westphal).
Today, almost all the police departments
use the technology which has also spread to other countries worldwide. The
advancement in technology has seen the reduction of the equipment that once
filled the patrol car to as small as being transportable by hand.
Impacts of the use of
Police officers in the field were the
individuals who benefited a great deal from this technology. The camera as it
records everything provides security for the police officers from being
attacked by people. Through the recording of the events, the work of the cop
becomes easy when it comes to making reports of the day’s activities. The
installation of these cameras in the patrol vehicles has enabled the police department
to win back the trust from the public that had been lost due to issues relating
to racial profiling ("5 Awesome Benefits Of In-Car
Although the above has been achieved,
some matters need to be looked into as far as the laws are concerned. It has
been seen that the technology today has no limit, therefore, the need for
technical personnel to develop better cameras that help capture everything
happening around the patrol vehicle hence eliminating blind spots in the
Calculate The Price Of Your Order
Total Price After Discount:
Frequently Asked Questions
All our writers are PHD prepared individuals. All the writers have vast experiences in specified fields for example for nursing orders the writers must have (nursing experience and major exposure to healthcare)
We get our articles from PubMed (for medicine orders and nursing) and whatever we can access through Google and scholarly references. We use professional sites and any relatable recent references within ten years.
We have a strict 0% plagiarism policy. All our papers are written from scratch and are properly cited.
Furthermore, we use premium plagiarism checkers to scan all documents before delivery.
The paper you will receive will be 100% original.
Email everything to us at firstname.lastname@example.org. You will receive a confirmation email from the support staff.
First, proceed to place your order then you can attach and send everything else the writer will need via email.
Yes, any alterations will be free of charge as long as they are in line with the initial instructions provided. No "surprises" regarding the price.
Any feedback from her professor will be taken seriously, and the writer (under our terms) will work on all changes without any extra payments (we do not have any hidden charges).
We will conduct a free plagiarism check, chapter by chapter. Editing is free of charge since the writer works hand in hand with an assigned editor.
The account will automatically be created for you by our database. The account only notes your order details and the price for your order, nothing much.