A first ever survey on national drug
abuse to inc...
A first ever survey on national drug
abuse to include elementary school children as respondents suggested that
children become more vulnerable to the appeal of narcotics the moment they
leave the familiar environment at the primary level and try to fit into the
middle school (Wren). Various programs are therefore formed that seek to help
these children not to fall into the trap of drug abuse. D.A.R.E (Drug Abuse
Resistance Education) is one of these programs. However, it has been contested
whether the program is effective or not. This paper looks at the opinions of
those who believe it works the view of those who do not believe in the program
and the alternatives of the program.
D.A.R.E is a program that was launched
in 1983 and as of today, it is taking place in 75% of US district schools and
in over 50 other countries. Over 70,000 police officers have been trained and
working with these children. However, there have been questions whether the
program is working or not. The proponents contend that the program improves the
social interaction between the police officers, the schools, and the students,
it is popular with both parents and children, and it is the most preferred
program in the United States. On the other hand the opponents, through the
support of peer review research, believe that the program is ineffective at
preventing children from using drugs, and it is even actually associated with
increased use of these drugs among the children. Another group of people
believes that alternative programs would be more helpful compared to the DARE program
("D.A.R.E. - Procon.Org").
The proponents, who are the leaders of
the D.A.R.E program, believe that the program should not be deemed as not
working on the basis of evidence from speculative research like it has always
been judged by the scientists (Hanson). They believe that the program is worth
regardless of the cost or efficiency as long as it can stop even one child from
getting into drugs, becoming an addict or even dying from an overdose
("D.A.R.E. - Procon.Org"). Their view as the leaders is imperative
because they are the owners of the project. If the project was to succeed, they
need to show people that the project is necessary. People would not believe in
the project if its initiators did not defend it.
The opponents are the scientists who
have continuously since the inception of the program, criticized its
effectiveness. One research in Houston, Texas showed that instead of the
program preventing the drug use, there was a 35% increase in smoking tobacco and
a 29% increase in drug use among the students in the D.A.R.E program (Hanson).
The opponents also believe that the program only lures parents into believing
that it works. Hence they become less involved with their children’s life as
drugs are concerned since the D.A.R.E is doing all the work. What results from
this is neglect and children falling in the drug pitfall. Their voice is
important because it highlights the issues with the program hence alerting
parents and the authority to rethink on various decisions like funding the
organization or allowing their children to participate ("D.A.R.E. -
Finally, there is the group of people
advocating for alternative solutions. Dr. William Hansen, one of the people who
helped design D.A.R.E original curriculum thinks that the program should be
ended entirely and redevelop another with new strategies which will be
effective (Hanson). He is an example of many others with the same view which is
important to the whole issue. It offers a solution for the tag or war between
the proponents and opponents and ends the battle.
Both sides of the argument are valid
since they have their reasons for supporting they stand. The proponents have
shown the positive aspect of the program which is help children overcome drug
use while as the opposing side has demonstrated that even if the program works,
it is only at the initial state. Addiction continues to affect young people in
our country therefore there needs to be an efficient system or program that
works to save the young generation.
Calculate The Price Of Your Order
Total Price After Discount:
Frequently Asked Questions
All our writers are PHD prepared individuals. All the writers have vast experiences in specified fields for example for nursing orders the writers must have (nursing experience and major exposure to healthcare)
We get our articles from PubMed (for medicine orders and nursing) and whatever we can access through Google and scholarly references. We use professional sites and any relatable recent references within ten years.
We have a strict 0% plagiarism policy. All our papers are written from scratch and are properly cited.
Furthermore, we use premium plagiarism checkers to scan all documents before delivery.
The paper you will receive will be 100% original.
Email everything to us at firstname.lastname@example.org. You will receive a confirmation email from the support staff.
First, proceed to place your order then you can attach and send everything else the writer will need via email.
Yes, any alterations will be free of charge as long as they are in line with the initial instructions provided. No "surprises" regarding the price.
Any feedback from her professor will be taken seriously, and the writer (under our terms) will work on all changes without any extra payments (we do not have any hidden charges).
We will conduct a free plagiarism check, chapter by chapter. Editing is free of charge since the writer works hand in hand with an assigned editor.
The account will automatically be created for you by our database. The account only notes your order details and the price for your order, nothing much.