The conservatives, the
liberals, as well as the radicals have differing views on many significant
areas such as the human nature, the individual behavior, the family, social
systems, in addition to the role that the government plays in the assistance of
those people who are in need.
Conservatives have a
tendency of resisting change and maintain status quo. They have the perception
that change has more negative outcomes as compared to positive effects. The
social welfare programs usually correspond to the non-traditional approach of
tackling problems. For instance, Newport & Mendes (1) assert that one in
every six United States citizens do not have health insurance coverage, and the
government should create social programs to cover every citizen. On the subject
of human nature, conservatives assume a pessimistic perception. People are
viewed as being lazy, selfish, corrupt, lacking true charity, and, therefore,
they must be controlled. For instance, Gansberg (1) reports that among 38
people who witnessed another person being murdered did not make a step to call
the police. This is a selfish act from all of them. Their take on individual
behavior is that people possess a free will to act the way they want and that
they are responsible for their lives. Conservatives respect the “traditionalâ€
family and make an effort to preserve it. They consider it as a significant
source of strength. The conservatives view the social system as being
inherently unfair. In the case where some people are poorer in comparison to
others. Conservatives view on the role of the government in helping the poor
that the less the governing of the government is, the betters. This is because
most of the activities carried out by the government represent a threat to
personal liberty as well as the functioning of the free markets.
Liberals view change
differently as compared to conservatives. Liberals favor change. They as well
consider that constant change will bring continuous progress. According to the
liberals, all people are equal. The government has the accountability of
providing for the common good of the society. For instance, the social security
is one of the most popular. The
“Libertarianism†refers to the belief that a justifiable government ought to be
small and have a minimum role in the economy (The American Voice). Liberals
view the social structure as one that requires regulation so as to make sure
that there is fair competition between people who have the same interests.
Their view on human nature is that people are good, and they require structures
to strengthen good impulse. Nader asserts that they perceive human behavior as
being not comprehensively self-governing, as the environment has a part to play
in most of the problems that people face. In addition, they view the family as
one that is changing, and therefore needs support from the government. The role
of the government is to make sure that there is fairness and that its programs
aim at helping the poor.
The radicals view the
government’s role is not neutral; instead it is a system that mainly supports
the capitalism system. According to the radicals, most of the ills that take
place in the society stems from capitalism, which is illustrated by the
conflict between classes, for instance, rich and poor (Nader). The radical view
on change is similar to that of the liberals, that is, it is particularly good
when it implies a significant change in the system. Their view in human nature
is that people are good. However, these people may be corrupted by
institutions. According to the radicals, individual behavior is strongly
manipulated by both the social as well as the economic structures (The American
Voice). They view the traditional family as being oppressive and that the
varying family requires government support. According to them, on the role of
the government in assisting those in need is that a market economy is
manipulative as well as essentially unfair. The radical view on social systems
is that it contains inequalities, which brings in conflict involving those who
are in power and the common citizens, which brings out the need for change (The
Worldview of Conservatives, Liberals, and Radicals 21).
Additional articles
~THE PROS AND CONS ABOUT LEGALIZING GAMBLING IN NEW YORK Introduction In the contemporary society, gambling has become an accepted reality in New York and also in the majority of the states in America. Gambling may be traced from as early...The-pros-and-cons-about-legalizing-gambling-in-New-York …
Read ArticleWorkplace Ethics: Have Gun, Will TravelGun control is a seriously debated issue in the United States. Lawmakers and the executive including the presidency often finds itself in hot water when wrongful deaths occur due to civilians misusing guns at...Workplace-Ethics …
Read ArticleINTRODUCTION Exordium- Did you know that 3.5% of our country’s national population consists of people living among us without legal permits? The Mexican immigrants make up almost half of the population, 49% to be precise. States like Texas...Immigration-Proposal …
Read Article