Ancient medicine is most of the time considered as irrational, and
this is because of limitations in knowledge and understanding of life and most
of all the human body. There were no streamlined systems of treatment and the
war against disease was put in the hands of gods. However, the developments
made by Hippocrates a Greek physician through his Hippocrates Corpus saw a
change to some form of rationality in the world of medicine. Based on the
chapters of the Corpus. Hippocrates provides very well informed teaching about
the treatment of some of the conditions of the body. This essay puts much focus
on a few of the chapters that deal with the treatment of broken limbs and
analyze it based on the notion that ancient medicine was in fact rational.
One
of the astounding aspects of the Corpus is Hippocrates broad knowledge of human
anatomy and more specifically the bones and how they are structured in the
human body. He explains the treatment of a broken arm where he advises the
bandaging of the arm while folding at the elbow to allow the weight of the arm
to act on the arm and the fracture to align itself. These are some of the
reasons to show that Hippocrates approach to medicine was rational.
1. The
Corpus advises turning the arm while folded towards the chest in order to allow
the fracture to correct itself while healing. These are all practices that are
used in today’s medicine and more importantly the handling of fractures. He
provides very rational thinking in the handling of fractures.
2. He
expertly explains the importance of proper orientation when bandaging broken
limbs, the specific ways dressing, using warm water and the level of bandaging
being a factor of the specific bone broken in the body. All these are all
practices of modern medicine used in handling fractures.
3. He
uses swelling and sickness around fractures to show progress and condition of
fractures. He also has great knowledge of must importance for holding bones in
place and how to orient the libs during recovery. A good example is sleeping
upright when the foot is recovering from an injury.
4. He explains a sign of poor recovery of a foot
injury on the heel by the development of necrosis which is an indicator of poor
supply of blood and a great negligence indication on the part of the physician
handling that particular patient. This shows that he also had knowledge about
blood vessels and their importance for blood supply.
5. Another
factor is associated with his inclination towards the health of patients that
encourages other physicians to take oaths that force them to focus on diligence
and quality services.
The corpus shows an
accumulation of great knowledge and experience in treatment by the physician
Hippocrates. They show great rational approach to medicine. Ancient medicine
had many limits in terms of knowledge, technique, and technology but some of
them were not irrational. The development of the complexity of medical
knowledge of today is based on the accumulation of small information and
experience from ancient medicine and this shows that it was rational..
Additional articles
Oedipus and Othello were heroic men that became victims of the tragic downfalls that can be easily compared and contrasted with each other with ease. Oedipus the King was written by Sophocles while William Shakespeare wrote Othello. The two writer...Compare/Contrast-the-tragic-hero-of-Opedius-Rex-with-the-tragic-hero-of-Othello-the-Moor. …
Read ArticleThe "Travels of a T-Shirt in the Global Economy:" by Pietra Rivoli 2nd Ed It is often a challenge to quickly discuss international trade because of its abstract nature. However, when the focus is based on a single product, then the concept of g...Travels-of-a-T-Shirt-in-the-Global-Economy …
Read ArticleHuman Services Practicum 2: Dealing with Stress and BurnoutPsychologists are worried that burnout and stress are leading causes of anxiety and depression. In this regard, I take various measures to de...Human-Services-Practicum-2:-Dealing-with-Stress-and-Burnout …
Read Article