Do you think medical expenses should be tax deductible? | MyPaperHub

DO YOU THINK MEDICAL EXPENSES SHOULD BE TAX DEDUCTIBLE? WHAT ABOUT THE HIGH REAL ESTATE TAXES WE ALL PAY? Other deductions that you think should be tax deductible? What about the finance charges you pay on your credit cards, should you get a tax break? Are any of these topics in the news? (CURRENT)



The medical expenses should be tax deductible. The reason to this is that medical expenses may turn out to be very expensive when especially one is dealing with a long-term illness, and they might not be able to earn enough from working. It becomes easy when the deductions offload the heavy burden of having to pay for the expenses and at the same time paying the taxes. The deductions can only be made if the medical expenses are more than 10% of the adjusted gross income (Greene-Lewis).

The real estate sector should not allow the tax deductions. The only area they should allow is when it comes to a mortgage. Sometimes it becomes hard for individuals when they have a mortgage to finance and growing interest. The situation might be difficult especially if it's a person with a young family will trying to purchase a home for the household. The deductions should be there even though they are just for people with families. The option for the young family is because business persons can take advantage of the exception if it is not exclusive to evade paying taxes (Greene-Lewis).

The finance charges cut on credit cards should be deducted. The reason for this being that it is an expense to the individual using the credit card yet they are charge when calculating the tax, they need to pay, and it is not of benefit to the individual instead it eats on the finance of the person. Other expenses that should be considered in deductibles are; transportation costs, travel expenses, and deduction for capital losses ("Tax Deduction").

In the current news on taxes is the difference between the candidates running for the presidency. Mr. Donald Trump is of the opinion that when he assumes power, he will ensure that taxation for high-income earners goes down to promote investment and growth. Ms. Hillary Clinton, on the other hand, is of the opposing view where she will increase taxation on the wealthy which the government will spend on funding low and middle-income household (Mathur).

Additional articles

Robert Johnsons Foundation Role in the Future of Nursing Leadership and Change

According to Burnes Bolton, nurses are not only needed at the decision-making table but also in leadership positions. When nurses are in leadership positions, they will be in a position to come up with more innovative ways of bringing health care ...Robert-Johnsons-Foundation-Role-in-the-Future-of-Nursing-Leadership-and-Change …

Read Article
Persuasive Speech on Poverty in America

Distinguished guests, ladies, and gentlemen; today I seek to address an issue that has been here for us from one generation to another. It is common to switch on the television and see a campaign to aid children in Africa who live in abject povert...Persuasive-Speech-on-Poverty-in-America …

Read Article
Aristotelian and Modern Causation

Causation: Causation is amongst the ardently debated subject within the contemporary as well as historical. Aristotle's musings on causality are a result of his more excellent thoughts on the way of progress. He delivered a plan of four principal ...Aristotelian-and-Modern-Causation …

Read Article
Let's give your paper the attention it deserves