Decoding Descartes' Proposition: The Trademark
Argument Unveiled
The
Trademark argument was developed by A
French Mathematician and philosopher by the name of Rene Descartes. He uses the
trademark argument to try and to prove the existence of God. Based on this
argument having the concept of God proves in itself that God exists. The
concept of God is within us and is therefore like a trademark that He placed within us. The argument is based on the sources of ideas. The first
source is associated with the idea that has been derived from outside the mind. In this sense, the idea provides experiences which shape our perception. The second source of the idea is formed
our invention and lastly is the idea being innate. This is associated with an
idea being part of human nature. However, the main question is from which of
the three sources of the idea, the
existence of God can be derived from. Deriving the existence of God from either
of the three sources of the idea involves
the understanding that the cause of an idea must have a level of reality
associated with its effect. The effect of the cause of the idea provides a form
of reality that we can use to understand the idea itself. About the existence of God, the trademark argument points out that God is infinite, and therefore the idea of His existence
can never have come from Himself but then
He ought to be the Cause of the idea, and
therefore, he exists. The Descartes argues that man is finite while the concept
of God is infinite. A man has the concept of the existence of God. Men have
minds which can think and create many
ideas. Connecting these aspects whereby, the concept of God is infinite while
the man is finite shows that a man’s mind
could not have created such a concept of something having a higher reality than
the mind can create. It is for this reason that a man’s mind could not have created
the concept of God and thus it proves the existence of God (Lacewing, 2014).
Cartesian Circle objection
The Cartesian circle is experienced
in the arguments of Descartes but is more of a mistake in reasoning. The
general arguments of Descartes appear in the form of a circular argument rooted
in his argument for the existence of God.
The circular reason associated with the Cartesian circle is used by Descartes
to show that whatever we distinctly and perceive is the truth. Based on the
Cartesian circle argument, God is not a deceiver,
and thus our perception of God which is distinct and clear is the actual truth.
Descartes argues that God cannot allow him to make mistakes in perception and
reasoning and thus is ideas for which is perceives clearly and distinctly are
true. Based on his argument of the existence of God, guarantees that the
argument of distinct and clear perception. The acknowledgment
and acknowledgment acceptance of the existence of God is what brings out the aspect of a clear and distinct
perception.
The aspect of circulatory emerges to win the sense that at first Descartes has to
establish the fact that he exists and thinks. He,
first of all, seeks to find sources of knowledge and thus establishes
the argument of distinctiveness and clarity of perception as the truth. However,
he introduces the aspect of God as a deceiver,
and this casts doubts upon the first rule. Examining that God is a deceiver
helps him cast skepticism associated with his argument of the existence of God.
Then follows with the reality that the entirety and certainty of his knowledge
guarantees and backs the certainty of the existence of God. This creates a circular way of reasoning
because at first Descartes believes that whatever he perceives to be perceived
clearly and distinctly ascertains the truth as well as the existence of and at
the same time Descartes argues that the existence of God is based on a clear and distinct perception. This creates a circular way of reasoning and is referred to as the Cartesian circle. This is a potential mistake in the process of
reasoning.
The
Cartesian circle, therefore, explores the
differences between normal reason and distinct
and clear perception. Descartes’ view if the existence of God is clear and
distinct because God is perfect and therefore cannot deceive him (Causal adequacy principle, 2017).
Second objection
The first argument ascertains the existence of
God about the existence of the idea of
the concept of God. This argument has, however,
had many objections with people not
agreeing to it. First of all, Descartes
greatly relies on the principle of causal
adequacy. This is a philosophical
principle established by Descartes
himself and explores the existence of reality in an object to ascertain its
cause. The principle says that an effect can only exist when there is a cause. The casual adequacy was highly regarded in the time of Descartes, but in today’s world, it is a principle that has been highly discredited. Some of the objections
of the argument are based on the existence
of objects whose effects cannot be explained by their cause. Another factor of
objection is that the casual adequacy as used by Descartes emphasizes that the effects
have less reality than their cause. Objections to this argument point out that
existence itself is not quality. However,
based on this idea, something that is in existence
can have qualities. This objection,
therefore, shows that existence itself
should be considered in such a high
regard as Descartes gives it in the
trademark argument. In simple terms,
something either exists, or it does not.
The other objection to the trademark argument is
associated with the perception that the concept of the existence of God
is innate. However, if the idea of the existence of God ought to be innate, then everyone has to have this idea. Other
philosophers such as Freud viewed this opposition in the sense that the idea of the concept of the existence of God came
as a result of the need to have a father figure in people’s lives. Another theorist by the name of David Hume
explores the needs for humans to take considerations and magnification of
certain qualities such as goodness, strength,
and wisdom. The need for such qualities created the need for the idea of the
existence of God (Causal adequacy principle, 2017).
References
Causal adequacy principle. (2017). Retrieved from
https://www.revolvy.com/main/index.php?s=Causal%20adequacy%20principle
Lacewing, M. (2014). Descartes’
‘Trademark’ argument. Taylor and Francis Group.
Additional articles
Air PollutionPollution in the environment is one of the pressing concerns facing our society today. The different types of pollution include air, water, soil and noise pollution. Environmental pollution has negative impacts on the environment and hum...Persuasive-Essay-on-Air-Pollution …
Read Article~Abstract.The review is about researches that have been done concerning the bio-geography of clouded leopards of Southeast Asia. It highlights on the specific countries (Nepal, Taiwan, Thailand, China and others) that the species is found. The rev...Biogeograpy-of-Clouded-Leopards-in-Southeast-Asia …
Read ArticleTitle of the Article: Farmer perception of land degradation and land quality in the Pindar’s River Sub-watershed, Clarendon, Jamaica. Author(s) of the Article: Bailey, S. Publication Date: 2003 Publication Source ...Analyzing-an-Article- …
Read Article